I have been cruising the lefty-independent sites and the predictable '1984', the Constitution is being trampled, ect.
Even if they didn't listen to the actual telephone conversations, a pentrap (capturing numbers dialed) is ILLEGAL without a court order.I am sure the President and Dick Cheney are buying up all the surplus railroad box cars to start sending us off to the re-education camps just as soon as the Sperry Super Computer in the basement at the NSA has the list completed.
Bush deserves Hell. The FBI, ATF, CIA, and NSA deserve hell along with him.
It's treason to the Constitution and our laws. Pretty soon we won't have the laws and the Constitution to cite because all of these people are doing everything they can to try and abolish them and put in new laws that strip us of our rights.
I don't like the idea that anyone is keeping track of who I call or where I go on the web, but it is happening. Mostly by the people you do business with. Somewhere out there you have a e-profile. What you buy, how you buy it, if you pay your bills on time, what websites you visit, for how long, how many minutes you spend on the phone during what times, and yes, who you call. You are a file that is bought and sold.
"As a general rule, Qwest does not release customer account information to unaffiliated third parties without your permission unless we have a business relationship with those companies where the disclosure is appropriate."If the NSA can crunch this data, the same data the phone company uses to market products and services, to catch the next sleeper cell before they blow up my kid's school, I will live with it.
Is it legal? It depends on what your view of Article II is.
To summarize, my very preliminary sense is that there are no Fourth Amendment issues here but a number of statutory problems under statutes such as FISA and the pen register statute. Of course, all of the statutory questions are subject to the possible argument that Article II trumps those statutes. As I have mentioned before, I don't see the support for the strong Article II argument in existing caselaw, but there is a good chance that the Administration's legal argument in support of the new law will rely on it.So I guess I will wait for President Bush to repeal the Bill of Rights while I pack my bag for the camps, or will I need any luggage?
4 comments:
I too heard the interview with Lileks... such lucidity. I'd like to see a transcript of that interview-he was terribly insightful and rational.
good post
Wondering what you're thinking of when you say "I don't like the idea that anyone is keeping track of ... where I go on the web, but it is happening."
Who is keeping track of web use and how are they doing it?
PS. Bush isn't interested in repealing the Bill of Rights ... he's happy believing and acting as though he is not constrained by it.
Who is tracking you? Lots of websites and ISPs track you through Cookies, or through your IP address. They know you where you go, how long you stayed there how many pages you viewed and what site you went to when you left.
Here is just one company who sells this service to web companies.
PS- Exactly how is the President believing and acting as though he is not constrained by the Bill of Rights?
Yes, individual websites can track us with cookies or by IP, but it's only possible for a website to track its own use. At lest if you have your browser set to only accept cookies from the website you're using. And I see no problem measuring that use,. I'm sure you look at your own stats.
Our ISPs can track everything, but I have no problem with that either ... my phone company tracks my calls and my banks track my financial transactions. Same thing.
It seems like you're implying there are companies other than our own ISPs are mining data from our Internet use - such is impossible unless an ISP sells or gives their data to another party.
Post a Comment