Friday, May 19, 2006

Why the kook left is going to get you killed

Just listen to this guy. Can you imagine if people like him were in control of this country?
Also included, with about half of the names on the petition, are comments that people posted on the website. Almost all of them, Mr. President, are polite comments that need not have scared you way. Reading through thousands of them, I'm struck by the insight and the eloquence of the various points of view you so routinely ignore.

While the comments are for the most part not rude, many of them are angry, and even those that are not angry are opposed to your policies, Mr. President. In fact, a lot of them ask you to resign or promise that you will be impeached. I'm wearing a shirt that reads "Impeach Bush and Cheney" not because I'm angry with you, not because I hate you, and certainly not because I support the last president who was impeached or his corrupt warmongering wife. Mr. President, I want you impeached so that we can have peace in the world and a democracy in America, so that you will stop killing Iraqis and not begin killing Iranians.
Look, I don't care why you are wearing your impeach Bush/Cheney t shirt, and I couldn't give a rip if your mad. You are a danger to this nation. You and your peace at any price friends would sit back and allow Iran and every other mad man with enough cash to acquire nuclear weapons.

I thought all you pacifist hated nukes? Or is just American capitalist, imperial nukes that make your panties bunch up?
If Iran had such weapons, that would not justify the use of force, any more than any other nation would be justified in launching a war against the world's greatest possesor of nuclear arms, the United States. The most effective way to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons would be to closely monitor its nuclear energy program, and to improve diplomatic relations -- two tasks made much more difficult by threatening to bomb Iranian territory. We urge you to lead the way to peace, not war, and to begin by making clear that you will not commit the highest international crime by aggressively attacking Iran.
Closely monitor its nuclear energy program? What world do you live in? Certainly not the real world, the one where you simply can't afford to trust that a nutter like Ahmadinejad is going to keep his word. He has already lied about Iran's nuclear program being built for energy, the UNAC found traces of weapons grade uranium in one of Iran's 'peaceful energy' sites.

But I guess that we have nukes, China has nukes, why not poor Iran. What is the big deal?
Because Iran is run by a guy who wants to bring about the end of history.

Now, if you believe him when he says he just wants to develop a peaceful civilian energy program, why won't you believe him when he says he wants to bring about the chaos that will lead to the return of the 12th Imam?

This is not the time to give peace a chance, this is the time to tell the Iranian people that you have allowed crazy, dangerous people to run your country. You had better summon up the courage to overthrow these Islamo-fascists or very bad things will happen to you.

7 comments:

NotClauswitz said...

These people are idiots who get angry and shout at telephone-poles when they can and do lose an argument with themselves.
The only time they are happy is when they make a soothing circular speech that only they can understand - too bad if it doesn't make any sense to anybody else. Crazy pontifical statements like, The most effective way to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons would be to closely monitor its nuclear energy program, and to improve diplomatic relations are just blah-blah-blah emanating from a bizzaro world of wishful thinking and poor potty-training.

Erik said...

The thought is a reiteration of the NNPT to witch Iran and the US are signatories: Nuclear states agree to help non-nuclear signers develop peaceful nuclear energy use. An additional benefit is it allows member states to be monitored.

By not helping Iran, it's we we not they that are ignoring the NNPT. Not that I'm a big fan of nuclear energy, but this is what the treaty says.

Erik said...

What makes you think military action against Iran will stem the desire and effort of right-wing Muslims to nuke Tel-Aviv?

Why would Iran not be like Iraq? And it's not as though we've accomplished our goals in Afghanistan, started five years ago.

Walt Lucas said...

As to the NNPT, that is a piece of paper.

Have you ever heard of the Non-Aggression pact that Hitler signed?

Yea, that one. The one he broke when he invaded the Soviet Union and killed a few million of their citizens.

You simply cannot trust unstable people with atomic weapons.

As to the Islamo-Fascists, they will never give up trying to destroy Israel and the US. That is why we must destroy Iran's ability to make a viable nuclear weapon.

What is your alternative strategy? Negotiating with the Mullahs? Allowing the UN to run an Oil-for-Reactors program? Which EU countries will make billions this time, greasing the palms of Kofi and his crew in Turtle Bay while the Mullahs get a working nuke?

You seem to have faith treaties with mad-men. Call me a cynic, but I think I know where this story ends. You never seem to address my obvious point that Ahmadinejad is crazy. Why?

NotClauswitz said...

The absence of our uninvited "help" doesn't drive the Iraninan nuclear program. I believe that we maybe might could possibly maybe (but highly unlikely) have a working Non-proliferation agreement - but only if we sent Haliburton in to build and run the reactors and keep it out of the Mullahs hands.
Iran is already like Iraq in ways that Iran likes by supplying and supporting the fascist Iraqi terrorists with shaped-charge IED materials, and in ways that Iran won't acknowledge: it's a hugely repressive and totalitarian government run by murderous idealogues much like Saddam Hussein, with a large number of people who want their freedom.

Erik said...

The NNPT indeed is a piece of paper - on which we've pledged to help non-nuclear powers to develop peaceful nuclear technologies.

I don't want to sound like I'm behind Ahmadinejad, but I'd like a more concrete reason to believe he'd usser in his nations complete destruction by launching a nuclear first-strike. What would be in it for him or Iran?

Walt Lucas said...

You must not understand the whole 12th Imam, end of the world belief he holds. Read up on it, he is indeed crazy, not ha ha crazy, Hitler crazy.